Already a subscriber? Make sure to log into your account before viewing this content. You can access your account by hitting the “login” button on the top right corner. Still unable to see the content after signing in? Make sure your card on file is up-to-date.
The United Kingdom has reiterated that they are confident in the integrity of their intelligence-sharing relationship with the United States following a recent high-profile security breach within the Trump administration that exposed classified military plans to a journalist.
Some shit you should know before you read: If you’re unaware, yesterday Jeff Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, published a report revealing that he had been added to a private Signal group chat that included several senior Trump administration officials, such as Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz. According to Goldberg, the group chat contained detailed discussions about an upcoming US military strike on Houthi rebels in Yemen, including the timing, target locations, sequencing of the operation, and the specific weapons systems to be used. These conversations reportedly took place hours before the strikes were carried out, raising immediate alarm among national security experts. Despite Hegseth’s public denial that any war plans were shared, the White House National Security Council has since confirmed the authenticity of the messages, prompting widespread concern over the use of an unsecured, non-government messaging app to coordinate and discuss sensitive military operations.
What’s going on now: While speaking to the House of Commons Defence Select Committee, UK Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard was pressed by various lawmakers about whether the accidental inclusion of a journalist in a classified US group chat had compromised British operational security or put UK personnel at risk. Pollard said, “All UK service personnel are covered by our normal approach to operational security, and the committee will understand that I won’t go into the details of how we keep our involvement in any support for military operations in the Red Sea or anywhere else [secure].” He reassured the committee that the UK has “high confidence that the measures that we have got with our allies, including the United States, remain intact.”
Addressing the potential implications of the US breach on UK intelligence-sharing, Pollard said that any similar failure to follow security protocols within the UK would trigger disciplinary action. He said, “There would be a clear consequence and disciplinary process for anyone that was not following those procedures.”
Lawmakers also raised questions about the protocols surrounding the handling and sharing of sensitive material. In response, Pollard said that the Ministry of Defence has “very clear policies in relation to what information can be shared and the format in which it can be shared.” He added, “We don’t comment on how allies share their information. I’m confident that we have robust measures to safeguard our information and our data, but we also have a very clear set of systems in place for when individuals don’t follow procedures, with sufficient consequences to reflect the actions that have been taken.”
